House District 49 Candidates

Abortion

Cindi is a pro-lifer, not an amateur lifer. She wants to end abortion, not regulate it. Legislators swear an oath to support the Constitution, and the Fourteenth Amendment states that no person can be denied equal protection or deprived of life without due process of law. The ending of a preborn human life violates both the state and federal Constitutions and the natural law on which they are based. 

Her opponent is on record as having voted against SB1’s Amendment #76/Protection of Life which would have protected every human life beginning at conception. 

Taxes and Spending

Cindi believes your wealth belongs to you, not the state and will fight to cut taxes and reduce spending. She is targeting economic boondoggles like the IEDC and Carbon Sequestration. Don’t worry though, she won’t compromise on infrastructure or public safety.

Her opponent voted for a “record tax cut” of $430 million for the current budget, but voted to increase that budget by $7.2B.

Constitutional Track Record

Cindi is on record as fighting against unconstitutional mandates posing as laws and for unalienable rights.

Her opponent voted against the right to worshipgathervisit the sick and elderly, and to be free from medical coercion.

Using constitutional standards to measure legislative voting records, https://thefreedomindex.org/in/ scored her opponent at 36% for the 2023 legislative session and a 40% lifetime rating.

Cindi is aiming for a score of 100% because H49 voters deserve constitutional representation.

Leftist Agendas

Sexualizing Children

Cindi was part of the team that successfully fought to remove pornographic materials from schools. She believes that the Level 6 felony for distributing harmful matter to minors should apply equally to all Hoosiers. That’s why she will continue to fight to remove pornography from public libraries.

Her opponent receives donations from the Indianapolis law firm of Taft Stettinius & Hollister which has a partner who lobbies for American Library Association policies at our Statehouse. 

Are lobbyists the reason our legislators refuse to remove libraries’ defense to prosecution for distributing harmful materials (aka pornography) to minors?

Carbon Sequestration

Cindi knows that carbon sequestration is based on faulty climate science and puts our aquifers and crops at risk. She is working hard to end the war on food and farmers.

Her opponent voted for carbon sequestration.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

Cindi understands that Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion policies deny the fundamental truth that all men are created equal.

Her opponent co-authored HB1077 which reduces funding to state educational institutions unless they choose suppliers that meet diversity requirements, including race and gender. 

Sexualizing children, carbon sequestration, and DEI are Leftist ideologies, not conservative principles.

Assertions of being 100% pro-life and a conservative fighter contradict her opponent’s voting records.